;
LEARN ABOUT OUR ACTIVE LAWSUITS AND INVESTIGATIONS

Active Cases

Berdeaux and Grablis, et al. v. OneCoin Ltd., Ruja Ignatova, Konstantin Ignatov, et al.

U.S. Dist. Ct. - Southern District of New York - Case No. 1:19-cv-4074

  • Class action lawsuit against proprietors and promoters of $4 billion Ponzi investment scheme based around sham cryptocurrency, non-existent cryptocurrency mining facilities, and falsely promoted and unregistered securities.
  • Complaint further alleges that OneCoin’s principals, along with Florida-based attorney Mark Scott, laundered hundreds of millions of dollars of investor funds.
  • Representing class of investors worldwide who invested in OneCoin trader packages/memberships and OneCoins.
  • On July 24, 2019, U.S. District Judge Valerie E. Caproni appointed Silver Miller to serve as Co-Lead Counsel in the class action lawsuit.
  • Class Action Complaint

Fabian v. NANO F/K/A Hieusys, et. al

Case No: 3:19-cv-00054

  • Class action lawsuit against U.S.-based blockchain developers and cryptocurrency issuer Nano f/k/a RaiBlocks alleging unregistered offer and sale of securities (XRB) and negligence in ushering XRB investors to open accounts and stake their assets at small Italian cryptocurrency exchange BitGrail, where $170 million of XRB were declared “missing” in February 2018.

  • Representing investors who transferred fiat currency or cryptocurrency to BitGrail to invest in XRB from October 24, 2015 - February 8, 2018.  The lawsuit seeks to recover recissory, compensatory, punitive and injunctive relief under Sections 12(a)(1) and 15(a) of the Securities Act and various state and common law claims against NANO, certain of its top officials, certain influential promoters that received compensation in exchange for selling XRB or soliciting the general public to purchase XRB, and its partner BitGrail.  

  • Class Action Complaint

Lagemann, et al. v. Spence, et al.

U.S. Dist. Ct. - Southern District of New York - Case No. 1:18-cv-12218

  • Million-dollar lawsuit against promoters and proprietors of Ponzi investment scheme based around sham entity (Coin Signals) and fraudulent cryptocurrency hedge funds
  • Representing investors worldwide alleging false and intentionally misleading representations about cryptocurrency investment programs and fraudulently-presented account balances
  • Complaint
  • Order Granting Preliminary Injunction

[Confidential] v. AT&T

American Arbitration Association - Case No. 01-18-0003-7841

  • Lawsuit against cellphone service provider who permitted unauthorized transfer of accountholder’s SIM card and private, confidential financial information to third party
  • Representing T-Mobile account holder from whom $621,000.00+ worth of cryptocurrency and other personal assets were stolen
  • Statement of Claim

[Confidential] v. T-Mobile

American Arbitration Association - Case No. 01-18-0003-7835

  • Lawsuit against cellphone service provider who permitted unauthorized transfer of accountholder’s SIM card and private, confidential financial information to third party
  • Representing T-Mobile account holder from whom $400,000.00+ worth of cryptocurrency and other personal assets were stolen
  • Statement of Claim

American Arbitration Association - Case No. 01-18-0003-7838

  • Lawsuit against cellphone service provider who permitted unauthorized transfer of accountholder’s SIM card and private, confidential financial information to third party
  • Representing T-Mobile account holder from whom $250,000.00+ worth of cryptocurrency and other personal assets were stolen
  • Statement of Claim

Chin Se Kim, et al. v. David Saffron, David L. Kagel, Kagel Law, P.C., et al.

State of California - County of Los Angeles - Superior Court Case No. BC 708601

  • Lawsuit against promoters, investment planner, and attorney/law firm operating financial scheme
  • Representing investors duped out of $200,000.00 - $400,000.00 in fraudulent purported high-yield, low risk cryptocurrency investment program
  • Amended Complaint 

Balestra, et al. v. Giga Watt, Inc., et al.

U.S. Dist. Ct. - Eastern District of Washington - Case No. 2:18-cv-00103-SMJ

  • $20 Million class action lawsuit against U.S.-based cryptocurrency mining operation based in East Wenatchee, Washington and Initial Coin Offering (ICO) promoter/seller offering self-created cryptocurrencies and mining equipment
  • Representing class of victims alleging false representations about mining facilities and unregistered sale of securities
  • On June 28, 2018, U.S. District Judge Salvador Mendoza, Jr. appointed Silver Miller to serve as Co-Lead Counsel in the consolidated class action lawsuit.
  • Consolidated Class Action Complaint

Leidel, et al. v. Coinbase, Inc.

U.S. Dist. Ct. - Southern District of Florida - Case No. 9:16-cv-81992

  • Class action lawsuit against U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange
  • Representing class of victims alleging that the exchange’s lack of security protocols facilitated laundering of over $8,300,000.00 of bitcoin stolen from class.
  • Class Action Complaint

Wildes, et al. v. BitConnect International PLC, et al.

U.S. Dist. Ct. - Southern District of Florida - Case No. 9-18-cv-80086

  • $2.5 billion class action lawsuit against U.K.-based cryptocurrency exchange with extensive worldwide presence, including United States, and U.S.-based social media sales force
  • Representing class of victims in multi-level-marketing Ponzi scheme alleging unregistered sale of securities, conversion, and civil conspiracy between exchange and its army of social media promoters
  • On June 20, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks appointed Silver Miller to serve as Co-Lead Counsel in the consolidated class action lawsuit captioned In re BitConnect Securities Litigation.

  • Third Amended Class Action Complaint

Hodges, et al. v. Monkey Capital, LLC, et al.

U.S. Dist. Ct. - Southern District of Florida - Case No. 9:17-cv-81370

  • Lawsuit against Initial Coin Offering (ICO) promoter and its principal
  • Representing numerous investors victimized by allegedly misleading sale of pre-functional, proprietary cryptocurrency tokens constituting securities fraud and unregistered sale of securities
  • Amended Complaint

Confidential Free Consultation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.